…and people laughed when I said I was going to put Windows Home Server on my Acer AspireOne.  Well, lo and behold, here it is!  Windows Home Server is a lot lighter on resources than Windows 7, and it consumes a lot less electrical power, too.Windows Home Server | Settings
What’s really interesting about Windows Home Server is just how easy it is to configure. I’ve spent a lot of time working with other versions of Windows Server, including the ancient NT 3.51, but none have been so easy to administrate as this.  Less than an hour after converting the installation DVD to flash and installing it on the netbook, the system was ready for it’s first external hard drive … a 1TB Seagate.

Now, however, comes the arduous process of moving 14+ Terabytes of information from my Ubuntu server to Windows Home Server … without buying any new hardware.  Suffice to say, patience is definately a virtue here.

Windows Home Server | Available Storage

I’ll be sure to write some updates in the future talking about how to install Windows Home Server on a netbook, and some of the pros and cons of doing so. The only thing I’m not looking forward to is retiring my old Ubuntu server. It’s been running on my trusty HP notebook for years without much trouble … but that HP has a foot and a half in the grave, and all the replacement parts are in Texas and cost more than the machine is worth.

Do you run Windows Home Server? Are you thinking about it? I’d love to know what you think of the over-simplified server OS.